1
Dr.Diaz
In today’s class,, we discussed the role of individuals in combating climate change. Climate change is a pressing global issue that requires collective action. Some argue that personal lifestyle choices, such as reducing carbon footprints and adopting sustainable practices, can make a significant impact. Others believe that individual actions alone are insufficient and that systemic changes and government policies are crucial. Where do you stand on this issue? Why?
Karen
I firmly believe that personal lifestyle choices play a pivotal role in combating climate change. Each individual has the power to make a difference through simple actions like conserving energy, reducing waste, and adopting sustainable habits. When millions of people make eco-conscious choices, the cumulative impact can be substantial. Personal actions also serve as a catalyst for broader change by raising awareness, influencing social norms, and pressuring businesses and governments to adopt sustainable practices. While systemic changes are vital, individual responsibility should not be underestimated as a force for environmental progress.
Brad
While individual actions are commendable, I believe that systemic changes and government policies are necessary to tackle climate change effectively. Addressing this global issue requires large-scale transformations across industries, infrastructure, and energy systems. Government regulations can incentivize businesses to adopt sustainable practices, invest in renewable energy, and reduce emissions. Systemic changes also address environmental justice issues by ensuring equitable access to clean air, water, and a healthy environment for all. Additionally, international cooperation and agreements are crucial for global solutions. Individual actions alone are insufficient to achieve the systemic changes needed to combat climate change comprehensively.
Ans
I agree with Karen. Karen stated that the individual lifestyle has a impact on fighting climate change. She points out that by conserving energy, reducing any type of waste, and adopting sustainable habits can make a change to climate change. However, she didn’t mention on how it would impact the planet, therefore I would add that by doing jobs mentioned by her, we can lower the unnecessary CO2 produced, and at the end of the day, lower the average global temperature.
Brad mentioned that changes and government policies are crucial to combat with climate change, but I think he should add more points on how industries produce wasteful products that impact our climate. For example, for a country consists with lots of semiconductor firms, they use lots and lots of energy and most of them are fusil fuels, making the matters worse.
2
Dr.Diaz
In today’s class, we discussed the concept of nature versus nurture in human development. The debate centers around the extent to which genetics (nature) or environmental factors (nurture) shape an individual’s personality, behavior, and mental health. Some argue that genetic predispositions play a significant role, while others emphasize the impact of environmental influences. Where do you stand in the nature versus nurture debate? Why?
Karen
In the nature versus nurture debate, I believe that both genetics and environmental factors play integral roles in shaping human development. While genetics may provide a foundation for certain traits and predispositions, environmental factors heavily influence their expression and manifestation. The environment in which an individual grows up, including their family dynamics, socioeconomic background, and cultural influences, can significantly impact their behavior, personality, and mental well-being. It is through the interaction between nature and nurture that we can truly understand the complexity of human development and strive for a holistic approach in psychology.
Brad
While acknowledging the importance of environmental influences, I tend to lean more towards the significance of genetics in the nature versus nurture debate. Genetic factors lay the groundwork for our biological and physiological processes, which can subsequently influence our psychological traits and tendencies. Research in behavioral genetics has consistently shown a hereditary component in various aspects of human behavior, including intelligence, temperament, and susceptibility to mental disorders. However, it is important to note that genes do not act in isolation, and their expression can be influenced by environmental factors. Therefore, studying the interplay between genetics and environment is crucial to gain a comprehensive understanding of human development.
Ans
Karen pointed out that both genetics and environmental factors shape human behaviors. I would critic that recently there’s a study on how genetics impact your knowledge on different subjects, including math, science and more. It shows that there’s significant impact by genes, and the environment only plays a small role on that. Therefore I agree with Brad that there’s more considerable impact by genes compared to nurture. From my experience, I’ve twins that have been separated from their family since they were born. Even though they have different families, they are both good at the same subject, in this case, they are both good at computer science, and planning to pursue on computer science degree. From this experience, because they both have similar genes, therefore I agree more with Brad.
3
Dr.Diaz
As I mentioned in class, technology advancements have a profound impact on society. Governments often face the challenge of determining the allocation of resources between investing in scientific research and promoting social welfare programs. If you were a policy maker, which issue would you argue is more important—investing in scientific research or promoting social welfare programs? Why?
Karen
Investing in scientific research should take precedence. Technological advancements drive progress and innovation, benefiting society as a whole. Scientific research leads to breakthroughs, new discoveries, and improved quality of life. Furthermore, advancements in technology can eventually support the development of effective social welfare programs.
Brad
I disagree with Karen. Promoting social welfare programs should be the priority. Meeting the immediate needs of individuals in society is crucial for their well-being. By investing in social welfare programs, we address poverty, healthcare, and education, creating a more equitable and inclusive society. Social welfare programs lay the foundation for progress and can provide a supportive environment for scientific research in the long ru
Ans
I agree with Karen. Brad pointed out that social welfare programs were the fundamental of environment for scientific research, but in reality, it is completely otherwise. Imagine living in a world with less advanced technologies, maybe cellphones aren’t even invented yet. People will have no ways to communicate, making social welfare programs harder to distribute because the government simply can’t figure out who is the person that needed the most help. Furthermore, modern day AI technology breakthroughs may be non existence. Therefore, Karen’s statement was better, because with new technologies, people will be able to help each other more easily. For example, for those who can’t understand basic languages, we can help them by using artificial intelligence tools, closing the gap between the people that needed help, and normal individuals.